Prehistory

Dunkleosteus: why a famous giant fish may have been shorter

Dunkleosteus: why a famous giant fish may have been shorter
Header artwork: Julian Johnson. Artist reconstruction.

Dunkleosteus was a large fish with heavy armour around its head. It lived during the Devonian Period. Sharp bony edges in its jaws did the cutting. These were not ordinary rows of shark teeth. The hard front of the animal preserves much better than the body behind it. The armour surrounded the front of the animal rather than enclosing a whole shark-shaped body. That difference matters when choosing living fish for comparison. A familiar silhouette is not always the best scientific guide. [1] [2]

Artist reconstruction of Dunkleosteus.
Artist reconstruction of Dunkleosteus. Image: Julian Johnson.

An armoured head

That uneven fossil record creates a size problem. A large skull does not tell us the full length by itself. Researchers must estimate the missing body using comparisons. Older reconstructions often gave Dunkleosteus a very long outline. The choice of comparison animal can strongly affect that result. Two fish can have similar head lengths but very different tails and trunks. Scaling one animal from another therefore requires care. The missing portion is where much of the disagreement begins. [1] [2]

Artist reconstruction of Dunkleosteus.
Artist reconstruction of Dunkleosteus. Image: camusaltamirano.

Estimating the missing body

A study reported in 2023 used a different method based on head proportions. It proposed much shorter lengths for Dunkleosteus terrelli. A well-known specimen was estimated at roughly three and a half metres. That was far below some widely repeated older figures. The result was a revised estimate rather than a newly discovered complete body. The proposed method linked head measurements with body proportions in other fishes. It offered a new way to fill the gap behind the fossil armour. New methods can change an estimate even when no new specimen is found. [1] [2]

Artist reconstruction of Dunkleosteus.
Artist reconstruction of Dunkleosteus. Image: Joshua K.

A different shape in the water

A shorter reconstruction would make the fish look stockier. It would not remove the large jaws or armoured head. Those parts remain directly supported by the fossils. Scientists can test the body estimate with further comparisons and discoveries. Dunkleosteus shows how a familiar fossil can change shape without changing its preserved bones. A stockier model also changes how the same head looks beside the body. The animal may seem less stretched out while remaining very powerful in appearance. That visual difference follows the chosen proportions rather than a change to the jaws. [1] [2]

Sources